Types of FGM illustrated

8898 0

WHO defines FGM as all procedures that involve partial or total removal of the external female genitalia, or other injury to the female genital organs for non-medical reasons, and includes:

 

                                                             Type I (Clitoridectomy)

Involves partial or total removal of the clitoris.

 

 

                                                                            Type II (Excision)

This is the partial or total removal of the clitoris and the labia minora, with or without excision of the labia majora.

 

                                                    Removed entire clitoris, partial or total cutting of labia inora

                                                                             

                     (Source: WHO/FCH/GWHO/01.3WHO/RHR/01.16)

 

                  Type III ( Infibulation)

This is the narrowing of the vaginal orifice with the creation of a covering seal by cutting and appositioning the labia majora, with or without excision of the clitoris.

Removed clitoris, labia minora, labia majora and stitching together of raw surfaces (infibulations)

                                                                

     Source: CNLPE, BURKINA FASO)

Type IV

Includes pricking, piercing or incising of the clitoris and/or labia; stretching of the clitoris and/or labia; cauterisation by burning of the clitoris and surrounding tissue; scraping of tissue surrounding the vaginal orifice or cutting of the vagina; introduction of corrosive substances or herbs into the vagina to cause bleeding or for the purposes of tightening or narrowing it; and any other procedure that falls under the definition of FGM/Cgiven above.

                                                             

                    (Source: WHO/RHR/01.16)

                                Example;    Pulled LABIA MINORA

 

 

 

 

 

3Shares

Tony Mwebia

Founder & Executive Director (Men End FGM), Gender Equality Advocate, Writer, Activist & Consultant

There are 1 comments

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Your MessagesYour Name * Your Email * Your Website

Related Post

Men have No Idea!

Posted by - October 28, 2016 2
Female genital mutilation continues to bite in Kenya with the national prevalence currently standing at 21%. This figure is misleading…

The Micro-Economics of FGM

Posted by - March 31, 2017 0
We have constantly addressed the social aspects of FGM but have failed to keenly analyze the micro-economics of this harmful…